The base is the same. The difference is the format: instead of competing for a click, we compete to be the source the machine cites.
No. AI models feed on the same pages that rank in Google. A store that is weak in search is weak in AI answers too.
The generated answer at the top of Google, assembled from several sources. Our goal is for your store to be one of them.
I do not recommend it and do not sell it separately. If the category pages are not in order, there is nothing to cite.
The technical changes are made quickly; whether the machines cite you more often shows after a few months. We measure it against the same list of questions every month.
A generated answer at the top of the results, assembled from several sources and shown before the ordinary links. If your store is not among the sources, some customers get their answer without ever seeing you.
For some informational queries — yes. For queries with buying intent people still open stores. That is why the priority is to be cited where the decision is made, not on every topic indiscriminately.
Yes, it happens. It becomes less likely when you have your own data, names and phrasing that appear nowhere else — then the source has to be named.
It is useful and takes minutes, but it is not magic. I add it after bot access, structured data and page format are in order.
If you block them, you become invisible in the answers. For an online store that is rarely worth it — your product data is public anyway.
With bot access and structured data on the product pages. Those are the cheapest changes with the fastest effect.